mood global services mgs logo
quantum readiness hero asset

Quantum Readiness

Quantum computers running Shor's algorithm will break the public-key cryptography in use today: RSA, ECDSA and Diffie-Hellman. Symmetric encryption such as AES-256 holds up.
That puts asymmetric cryptography first in line, because it protects the keys that everything else depends on. Find out where your organisation stands with a free scan.
quantum readiness hero asset
quantum readiness page gradient

Store now, decrypt later

The quantum threat is not a future problem. Encrypted traffic intercepted today can be stored cheaply and decrypted the moment a cryptographically relevant quantum computer exists. Any data whose confidentiality must outlive the migration is therefore already at risk. Mosca's theorem makes the deadline concrete:

migration time + confidentiality term > time to quantum computer

If this holds for your data, and for long-lived data it usually does, the clock is already running.

The standards are here
ML-KEM
FIPS 203

Module-lattice key encapsulation. The post-quantum replacement for the key exchange that protects data in transit.

ML-DSA
FIPS 204

Module-lattice digital signatures. Quantum-safe authenticity for certificates, software signing and identities.

SLH-DSA
FIPS 205

Stateless hash-based signatures. A conservative fallback built on well-understood hash function security.

NIST finalized these standards in 2024, and the practical path is available today: TLS 1.3 with hybrid ML-KEM key exchange. There is no TLS 1.4 coming to solve this for you. Regulation is moving too, with the EU coordinated PQC roadmap and NIS2 putting crypto governance on the organisation's agenda.

The EU coordinated roadmap
2026
First steps

National PQC transition roadmaps established, pilots for high- and medium-risk use cases initiated.

2030
High-risk done

PQC transition for high-risk use cases completed. Quantum-safe software and firmware upgrades enabled by default.

2035
Full transition

PQC transition for medium-risk use cases completed, low-risk as much as feasible.


Full compliance isn't possible yet. Readiness is.

Even if you wanted to be fully post-quantum today, your suppliers won't let you. Microsoft plans to be “quantum safe enabled” by the end of 2029 and to phase out legacy cryptography between 2030 and 2035. Measured against a harvest-now-decrypt-later adversary that is already collecting, that is slow. Most vendor stacks tell a similar story.

Waiting for the ecosystem to catch up is not a strategy. Organisations that get ready now, knowing where their cryptography lives, which chains are critical and which suppliers are the bottleneck, can migrate the moment each dependency unlocks.

Maintain backwards compatibility

Adopt hybrid schemes that combine classical and post-quantum algorithms, so you stay interoperable with partners and suppliers who haven't migrated yet.

Adopt new standards where possible

No-regret moves are available today: TLS 1.2 to TLS 1.3 migration and enabling ML-KEM key exchange wherever your stack already supports it.

Map your crypto dependencies

Identify where cryptography lives in your own landscape and across your supply chain, and which critical chains depend on suppliers being ready.

Put PQC in procurement

The transition is not just an IT project. It spans people, governance and purchasing. Ask suppliers for their roadmaps and put PQC requirements in contracts now.

quantum readiness framework icon

The framework

We built an LLM-based agent framework that works with your organisation on PQC compliance. It integrates with your repositories on GitHub or any other host, scans your landscape and reports where you stand.

Unlike pattern-matching scanners, the agents understand context: how a key is used, which chain depends on it, and whether a finding actually matters. The result is not a pile of matches but a Crypto Bill of Materials you can plan a migration on.

Language-independent

Agents reason about cryptographic usage in any language, framework or configuration format. There are no per-language rule packs to maintain.

No data leaves your organisation

The framework installs and runs entirely inside your own infrastructure. Source code, keys and findings never leave your perimeter.

Modular access levels

You decide what the agents may touch: read-only analysis per repository, or read/write capabilities for assisted remediation.

Crypto Bill of Materials

A full inventory across OS, middleware, networks, software, libraries, plugins and hardware components, with your critical chains identified.

Concrete, classified findings

Deprecated and quantum-vulnerable algorithms (RSA, ECDSA, DH), hardcoded keys, certificates and their expiry. Every finding is classified classical or quantum-safe.

Re-runnable, anytime

Run the scan on demand or on a schedule. Each report tracks progress against the previous one, turning compliance into a continuous process.

How a scan flows
Repositories
OS
Middleware
Networks
Libraries
Certificates
Hardware
01
LLM agent network

Reads your estate in context, in any language or format, entirely inside your perimeter.

02
Crypto Bill of Materials

A full inventory of where cryptography lives, with critical chains identified.

03
Classified findings

Every algorithm, key and certificate marked classical or quantum-safe.

04
Migration roadmap

A prioritised, supplier-aware plan you can act on and re-run anytime.

Where this is heading
Automated certificate & key renewal

Crypto agility built in: request, replace and roll over certificates and key material automatically as standards and lifetimes change.

Generated migration roadmaps

Turn the inventory into a prioritised, supplier-aware migration plan: risk-based, value-based or outside-in.

Binary & firmware analysis

Verify what actually ships, not just what source code intends, by surfacing vendor-supplied and compiled-in cryptography that repo scans can't see.

An extensible agent network

The same framework generalises to other scanning domains: security audits, bug detection, dependency health and beyond.


How we approach it

Eight steps, from knowledge and inventory to transition and governance. The approach follows what is used across Dutch government and the ETSI three-phase migration model.

01
Analyse

Build PQC knowledge on your critical chains: algorithm response, resource usage, benchmarking.

02
Inventory: Crypto BOM

Map cryptography across OS, middleware, networks, software, libraries, plugins and hardware. Establish critical chains.

03
Crypto agility

Automate the crypto chain so certificates and key material can be replaced quickly, both now and at every migration that follows.

04
Market & supplier analysis

Surface supplier roadmaps and quantum-safe products. Put PQC requirements in tenders and contracts.

05
Impact on your landscape

Determine which systems and processes are affected by the PQC transition, and in what order.

06
Migration roadmaps

Risk-based, value-based or outside-in. Dependencies mapped, impact on operations assessed, planning set.

07
No-regret measures

TLS 1.2 to TLS 1.3 migration. Enable ML-KEM key exchange wherever it is already possible.

08
Chain partners & governance

Build cooperation with chain partners and government. Set up governance for a coordinated transition.


Request a free scan

See where your organisation stands. We run our framework against a repository of your choice, inside your own infrastructure, read-only, with no data leaving your perimeter. Afterwards we walk you through the crypto inventory and findings together.

The scan is free and works like an initial audit: no commitment and no preparation needed. Leave your details and we'll get in touch to set it up.

Fields marked * are required.

I agree to the processing of personal data